HumanitiesWeb HumanitiesWeb
Periods Alphabetically Nationality Topics Themes Medium Glossary
pixel - The First Impressionist Exhibition

Sort by Period
Sort Alphabetically
Sort by Nationality
Themes in Art


Get Your Degree!

Find schools and get information on the program that’s right for you.

Powered by Campus Explorer

& etc

All Rights Reserved.

Site last updated
28 October, 2012
Real Time Analytics
The First Impressionist Exhibition
"...the common concept which united them as a group and gives them a collective strength in the midst of our disaggregate epoch is the determination not to search for a smooth execution, but to be satisfied with a certain general aspect. Once the impression is captured they declare their role terminated... If one wants to characterise them with a single word that explains their efforts, one would have to create the new term, Impressionists. They are impressionists in the sense that they render not a landscape but the sensation produced by a landscape." With these words, the art critic, Jules Castagnary, in 1874, gave a name, shape, and form to something that had heretofore lacked all three.

The occasion was a review of the disastrous joint exhibition staged by a renegade group of disillusioned and disenfranchised artists as a direct affront to the hated Salon with whom they had grown tired of battling for admission. They were about 35 in number, some now household names, some unheard of then and now. (Edouard Manet was conspicuous by his absence.) They presented 163 works ranging from a few fairly academic pieces to three little outrages by Paul CÚzanne that guards feared might be ripped apart by the crowd. They might have been right except for the fact there was no crowd. A few sympathetic critics praised the show, a few more clobbered it, and perhaps fortunately, most of them simply chose to ignore it. In large part, so did the public.

Attendance at the show was abysmal. There were 175 on the opening day and that dwindled to about 54 on the last day of the month-long exhibition. The show was unique in that it was open during the evenings, but attendance was seldom more than 10 to 20 during these hours, and sometimes as low as 2. Altogether, some 3,500 people paid one Franc each to see the show. Meanwhile, across town at the Salon, some 400,000 paid ten Francs to see over 4,000 works. There, Manet found he might as well have exhibited with the newly dubbed Impressionists in that, despite his best efforts, critics linked his name with the group and labelled his two Salon-accepted works as "intruders" appearing doubly ridiculous compared to those hung next to his. Even though Castagnary's words regarding the First Impressionist Exhibition were written in derision, his review was at least somewhat sympathetic and thoughtful, compared to many others ridiculing the show. Ironically, it was his words served to unite this group into a movement with a new name and a single direction, something they had lacked before.

Contributed by Lane, Jim
7 July 1998


Terms Defined

Referenced Works