Let Us now examine the estates of freedmen. In former times it was
lawful for a freedman to pass over his patron in his will with impunity; for a
law of the Twelve Tables called the patron to the succession of the estate of a freedman only where the latter died
intestate, without leaving any proper heir; and, therefore, even where the
freedman died intestate, if he left a proper heir, his patron had no right to
his property. If, in fact, the proper heir whom he left was one of his own
children, there seemed to be no cause for complaint; but where the son had been
adopted, it was evidently unjust that no right should survive to the
patron.
(1) Hence this injustice of the law was subsequently remedied by an
Edict of the Prætor. For if the freedman made a will, he was ordered to
make it so as to leave his patron half of his estate; and if he left him
nothing or less than half, possession of half his estate was granted to the
patron in opposition to the provisions of the will; and if he died intestate,
leaving an adopted son as his proper heir, possession of half of his estate
was, in like manner, given to the patron as against his direct heir. All
natural issue could, at one time, be made use of for the exclusion of the
patron, not only such as he had under his control at the time of his death, but
also such as had been emancipated or given in adoption, in case they were only
appointed heirs to a certain part of the estate, or, having been passed over,
brought an action under the Edict for possession of the property contrary to
the provisions of the will; as having been disinherited they in no way excluded
the patron.
(2) Subsequently, by the Lex Papia, the rights of patrons who had
wealthy freedmen were extended. For it was provided that a full share should be
due to the patron out of the estate of a freedman who left a hundred thousand
sesterces, and had less than three children, whether he executed a will, or
died intestate. When, therefore, a freedman left a son or a daughter as his
heir, half of his estate was due to the patron, just as if he had died without
leaving any son or daughter; when he left two heirs of either sex, a third part
was due to the patron; but when he left three heirs, the patron was barred from
the succession.
(3) But one of Our Constitutions which We have composed in the Greek
language with a complete interpretation for the enlightenment of all persons,
made a distinction in cases of this kind; so that if a freedman or freedwoman
be less than centenarii, that is to say, if they have property that is
worth less than a hundred aurei (for We have computed the sum stated in
the Lex Papia in such a way that an aureus is reckoned as equal
to a thousand sesterces) the patron shall have no place in their succession if
they have made a will; but if they died intestate, without leaving any
children, then the right of patronage which is derived from the Law of the
Twelve Tables remains unaltered.
When they are more than centenarii, and have descendants, one or
more in number, of either sex or any degree, as their heirs, or those entitled
to possession of their property, We have granted them the right to succeed to
their relatives, excluding the patrons along with their progeny; but if they
died without children and intestate, We have called the patrons both male and
female to the succession of the entire estate. Where, however, they made a will
and passed over their male or female patrons, either because they had no
children, or if they had disinherited them; or where a mother or maternal grandfather has passed
over her or his descendants, so that their wills cannot be attacked as
inofficious, then, in compliance with Our Constitution they obtain by
possession of the estate contrary to the provisions of the will, not half, as
was formerly the practice, but a third part of the estate of the freedman; or,
by Our Constitution any deficiency is made up to them in case the said freedman
or freedwoman left them less than a third of his or her estate; so free from
encumbrance that no legacies or trusts are to be paid out of said part to
descendants of either the freedman or freedwoman, but this burden is imposed
upon their co-heirs.
In the aforesaid Constitution many other cases have been collected by Us
which We have considered necessary for the establishment of this principle of
law; so that not only patrons of both sexes, but also their descendants,
together with their collateral relatives as far as the fifth degree, are called
to the succession of the estates of freedmen, as may be ascertained from that
Constitution; so that if there are any descendants of the patron or patroness,
or of two or more of them, he who is next of kin is called to the succession of
the said freedman or freedwoman, and the estate is divided per capita,
and not per stirpes.
The same rule is also applicable to those
related in the collateral line; for We have made the rights of freeborn and
liberated persons almost identical so far as succession is concerned.
(4) These are the regulations which should be set forth at present with
reference to those freedmen who have obtained Roman citizenship; for there are
no other freedmen, dedititii and Latins having both been abolished at
the same time; for there were really never any successions established by law
for the Latins, who, although they lived their lives as freemen, nevertheless,
with their last breath lost their life and liberty, and their manumitters by
the Lex Junia retained their property through a species of right of
peculium, as in case of slaves.
Subsequently, however, it was provided by the Largian Decree of the
Senate that the children of a manumitter, when not disinherited by name, should
take precedence over the foreign heirs of the former in succeeding to the
estates of Latins. To this was added an Edict of the Divine Trajan, which
provided that the same slave who had obtained citizenship by having it hastily
granted through the indulgence of the Emperor, his patron being unwilling or
ignorant of the fact, should, while living, be considered a Roman citizen, but
when dying, a Latin. But, on account of the changes in condition of this kind
and other difficulties, We have declared in Our Constitution that the Lex
Junia, the Largian Decree of the Senate, and the Edict of the Emperor
Trajan shall, along with the Latins themselves, be abolished forever; and that
all freedmen shall enjoy Roman citizenship, and by certain additional
enactments of a praiseworthy character We have rendered the very means which
were formerly used to obtain Latinity applicable to the acquisition of Roman
citizenship.
|