There is another kind of general succession which was introduced neither
by a law of the Twelve Tables, nor by the Edict of the Prætor, but by a
rule adopted by common consent.
(1) For instance, when the head of a family gives himself in arrogation,
all his property, both corporeal and incorporeal, and everything owing to him
were formerly acquired absolutely by the arrogator; except those things
destroyed by loss of civil rights, to which belong the obligations of service
and the right of agnation. Use and usufruct also, although they were formerly
included with the others, are forbidden by one of Our Constitutions from being
lost by the lowest degree of forfeiture of civil rights.
(2) Now, however, We have limited the acquisition which was formerly
obtained by arrogation, just as We have done that of natural parents; for
nothing but an usufruct is acquired through children by either natural or
adoptive parents in property which the children obtained from strangers, the
entire ownership being reserved for them. Nevertheless, if an arrogated son
should die while a member of the adoptive family, the ownership of the property
also passes to the arrogator, unless other persons survive who by Our
Constitution have a better claim than the father to such property as cannot be
acquired by him.
(3) But, on the other hand, the arrogator is not liable by the strict
terms of the law for anything that the party who gave himself in adop,tion
owes; but an action may be brought against him in the name of the son, and if
he refuses to defend him, the creditors are permitted by Our competent
magistrates to take possession and lawfully dispose of such property as would
have belonged to the son, together with its usufruct, if he had not subjected himself to the control of another.
|